
SOX, AML/KYC, PCI-DSS, OSFI, and Basel frameworks impose requirements that override business preferences. BA must document compliance requirements as first-class deliverables, produce traceability from system features to regulatory obligations, and design audit trail specifications that satisfy examiners.
Core banking, payment processing, and trading systems often run on legacy platforms with rigid interfaces. Integration requirements must account for data format constraints, batch processing windows, and regulatory data retention rules that modern platforms don't assume.
Technology decisions in finance involve business, IT, compliance, risk, legal, and audit functions — each with veto authority over different aspects of the solution. BA must navigate this governance landscape and produce requirements that satisfy all stakeholder perspectives.
Risk Management & Compliance Platforms
risk assessment model requirements, control framework mapping, exception handling logic.
Yes. Our analysts working in financial services engagements have experience with the regulatory frameworks that shape technology requirements. We produce requirements that trace to regulatory obligations, not just business needs.
Yes. We document integration requirements for legacy platforms including data format constraints, batch processing dependencies, and regulatory data retention rules.
Yes. Requirements traceability, compliance workflow maps, and audit trail specifications are standard deliverables for financial services engagements.
We use PESTLE analysis to map the regulatory landscape and produce requirements that satisfy all applicable frameworks. Conflicting requirements are escalated to compliance stakeholders with documented options.
Timelines vary by regulatory scope. A focused CRM implementation might take twelve to sixteen weeks. A core banking initiative with multi-regulator compliance can run six to eighteen months.
.png)
.png)