Business Analysis for Insurance
Key Facts
Why Does Insurance Need Specialized Business Analysis?
Insurance runs on rules. Eligibility, rating, underwriting and claims decisions live inside policy administration and claims systems that many insurers have run for decades, often with the business logic documented nowhere outside the code. When a province rewrites its auto product, as Ontario did on July 1, 2026 and Alberta will on January 1, 2027, those rules change across quoting, policy wording, broker data feeds and claims handling at the same time. Federally regulated insurers also have to meet expectations from the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) for technology risk and, from May 2027, model risk. Business analysis turns these obligations into traceable requirements before a vendor is selected or a configuration is touched. We stay vendor-neutral, so the requirements decide the platform.
What BA Challenges Are Unique to Insurance?
Legacy Core Systems and Undocumented Business Rules
Policy administration and claims platforms often carry decades of product versions and rating rules that nobody has written down. Before a replacement or upgrade, those rules have to be reverse-engineered into a documented rule set that the new platform is configured and tested against.
Regulatory Change With Fixed Deadlines
OSFI guidelines such as B-13 on technology and cyber risk and E-21 on operational resilience set expectations that reach into system design and change management. Provincial auto reforms and privacy rules such as Quebec's Law 25 bring their own deadlines. Every obligation has to map to a requirement and a test case, so nothing gets lost between the guideline and the release.
Claims and Underwriting Workflows
Severe weather seasons push claims volumes well past normal capacity, and fraud referral and customer updates still have to keep pace. Underwriting rules vary by province, line of business, risk class and distribution channel, and broker business arrives through CSIO data standards. BA documents these workflows and data flows before anyone automates them or adds AI.
What Projects Do We Support?
Core System Modernization (Guidewire, Duck Creek)
Claims Process Redesign (FNOL to Settlement)
current- and future-state process maps, triage and fraud referral rules, catastrophe surge procedures, straight-through processing requirements.
Regulatory Change (OSFI Guidelines, Auto Reform)
Broker and Digital Distribution (CSIO Standards, Quote-and-Bind)
Analytics and AI Governance (Power BI, OSFI E-23)
KPI definitions, dashboard specifications, model inventory and documentation, AI use case requirements.
How We Work in Insurance
We embed analysts with your underwriting and claims teams so the requirements reflect how decisions are made today, including the exceptions nobody wrote down. When a platform decision is on the table, we evaluate each option against those documented rules and your data. We work with clients across Canada and the United States, delivering remotely from Canada during hours that overlap with US time zones, with travel on request.
Our deliverables are the artifacts delivery teams build from: fit-gap analyses, business rule sets, data conversion mappings and acceptance criteria tied to loss ratio and claims cycle-time targets. For regulatory work, each OSFI, provincial or state requirement traces through to user stories and test cases, so compliance evidence exists before an auditor asks for it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. We are platform-agnostic: we document requirements and run fit-gap analysis on any policy or claims platform, starting from your own business rules and data.
Yes. We map requirements to OSFI guidelines such as B-13 on technology and cyber risk and E-23 on model risk, which takes effect May 1, 2027, along with provincial auto rules and Quebec's Law 25. Your compliance and legal teams own the interpretation, and we make sure each obligation lands in a requirement and a test.
Yes. We assess the impact on products, rating, policy documents and claims handling, then specify what each system and broker data feed has to change. Alberta's care-first system starts January 1, 2027, so that work needs to be finished and tested before then.
Both. Property and casualty work usually involves rating rules and broker data exchange, while life and health work involves benefits administration and group plan data. The BA method stays the same; the business rules change.
Timelines vary. A focused assessment, such as a fit-gap for one line of business or a regulatory impact analysis, might take six to ten weeks. A core system replacement can run a year or more, with BA support across each release.
Yes. We work with clients in Canada and the United States, delivering remotely from Canada during hours that overlap with US time zones, with travel on request. US insurance is regulated by each state, so requirements trace to the rules of the states in scope, and OSFI guidelines don't apply.
.png)
.png)